Compare

Cue vs Pitch

Pick Pitch to design decks together and send them, with sales rooms and tracked links that show how they're read. Pick Cue for the internal review you present live every cycle, with every number read again from its source and an audience that follows along in their own language.

Start free See the comparison

Checked October 21, 2026, from each product's public documentation and pricing pages.

Compared

At a glance

Cue compared with Pitch
What you need	Cue	Pitch
Numbers read from their source	YesStripe, Amplitude, Jira, Sheets and more, on a schedule	PartlyThrough integrations
The next cycle in one click, with what changed	YesFresh numbers, a What changed slide and story checks	NoNot built in
Viewers follow on their own screen	YesA follow link, no account or screen share	NoScreen share
Each viewer picks their language	YesTranslated live, in 30 languages	NoNot built in
Polls, Q&A and reactions	YesIn the follow link, with moderation	NoNot built in
Edit decks from Claude or ChatGPT (MCP)	YesCreate, edit, bind data and start the next review	PartlyCreates decks from a template, in Claude
Free-form canvas editing	NoBy design: ask for changes, or edit text and slide order	Yes
Export to PowerPoint	YesEditable .pptx, or a PDF	Yes
A deck from one prompt	YesFrom a brief, drawn in your brand kit	YesPitch Agent, from briefs, call notes and CSVs
Brand kit enforced on every slide	YesThe renderer enforces it, with a contrast check on every color pairing	YesOn-brand templates, and a template built from your website
Collaboration	PartlyRoles from viewer to owner, and a version for every edit	YesReal-time, in a polished editor
Analytics on shared links	PartlyViews, unique viewers and time per slide	YesSales rooms and tracked links, with engagement analytics

From each product's public documentation and pricing pages, checked October 21, 2026. The first eight rows are the same as in the comparison of all five tools.

Pitch's strengths

Where Pitch is better

Pitch is a polished deck tool, and for a lot of work it's the better choice.

A polished editor, built for working together. Several people can work on a Pitch deck in real time, with full control of every slide. Cue has roles and a version for every edit, but no free-form canvas: you ask for a change, or edit the text and the slide order.
On-brand templates, and an agent that uses them. Templates are one of Pitch's strengths, and they keep decks on brand. Pitch Agent (May 2026) builds decks from them and can build a template from your website. It takes briefs, call notes and CSVs as input, edits by chat and spots weak slides.
Made for decks you send. Since November 2024, Pitch has sold itself as a complete pitching platform for sales, marketing, account managers and agencies, with digital sales rooms, tracked links and engagement analytics. Cue's share links count views, unique viewers and time per slide, which is less.

Cue's focus

Where Cue is different

Pitch is centered on decks you send, above all for sales. Cue is centered on the internal review you present live, every cycle, with new numbers.

The next cycle in one click

Start next review copies last cycle's deck, reads every bound number again from its source and writes a What changed slide that puts each number next to last cycle's. Story checks flag any slide whose words the new numbers no longer support. Pitch doesn't have this built in.
Numbers from the source, kept as snapshots

Bind a number, chart or table to Stripe, Amplitude, PostHog, HubSpot, Jira, Linear, a Google Sheet, a CSV, a JSON URL or any MCP server. Sources refresh every hour or every day, and publishing keeps a snapshot, so last month's review still shows last month's numbers. In Pitch, live data comes through its integrations.
A follow link instead of a screen share

People on the call open the follow link, and the real slides move with yours on their own screens, builds included, at full resolution. They need no account and no app. Pitch has no follow mode.
Each follower picks a language

Followers choose one of 30 languages and read the same slide, translated, in step with you. Numbers come in their format, and Arabic and Hebrew read right to left. Pitch doesn't translate.
Polls, Q&A and reactions

Open a poll from your remote and the results fill in on the big screen as people vote. Followers ask and upvote questions, and you or a moderator let them through. Pitch doesn't have these built in.
Present from your phone

Scan the QR code on Cue's start screen and your phone becomes the remote: next and back, speaker notes, a timer against your time budget and a preview of what's next. Or stay on the laptop, with presenter view in a second window.
Your AI can edit, not only create

Add Cue's MCP server to Claude, ChatGPT or Cursor, and your agent can create decks, edit slides, bind data and start the next review, acting as you with your role. Pitch's MCP connector creates decks from your template, in Claude.
A brand kit the renderer enforces

Cue reads your website's colors, fonts and logo into a kit. Every slide takes its colors and fonts from the kit, and every color pairing has to pass a contrast check, so a deck can't drift off brand. A workspace keeps a library of kits, and each deck picks its own.

Together

Using both

Pitch exports to PowerPoint, and Cue imports PowerPoint files. Bring a recurring deck over as a .pptx, up to 20 MB and 60 slides, and Cue redraws every slide in your brand kit as slides you can edit, bind to live data and present. It tells you what didn't carry over, like animations and video.

Going the other way, any Cue deck downloads as an editable PowerPoint file, with real text, tables and charts, or as a PDF.

A sensible split: keep sales decks and rooms in Pitch, and run the weekly or monthly internal review in Cue.

The short answer

Which should you pick?

Pick Pitch if your decks go to customers and prospects, a team designs them together, and you want sales rooms and tracked links on what you send.

Pick Cue if you present the same internal review every week, month or quarter, your numbers live in tools like Stripe, Amplitude, Jira or a Google Sheet, and people follow from their own screens, in their own language.

Cue is free during early access. Later, Team will be €15 per seat per month, and viewers and commenters are free. See pricing.

Questions

Cue and Pitch, asked often

Sources

Introducing Pitch Agent (Pitch's blog, May 2026)
An MCP for decks worth sending (Pitch's blog, August 2026)
Pitch as a complete pitching platform (Pitch's blog)
Pitch pricing (Pitch)
Pitch's blog (Pitch)

Products change quickly: if something here is out of date, tell us.

Pitch is a trademark of its owner. Cue isn't affiliated with or endorsed by it.

Run your next review in Cue

Sign up with your email, import a deck you exported from Pitch or start from the weekly business review template. Free during early access.

Start free

Cue vs Pitch

At a glance

Where Pitch is better

Where Cue is different

The next cycle in one click

Numbers from the source, kept as snapshots

A follow link instead of a screen share

Each follower picks a language

Polls, Q&A and reactions

Present from your phone

Your AI can edit, not only create

A brand kit the renderer enforces

Using both

Which should you pick?

Cue and Pitch, asked often

Sources

Run your next review in Cue